Switch to ADA Accessible Theme
Close Menu

The Law Offices of Jason Goldman represents New York City clients in juvenile offender homicide matters and protects their interests through every hearing.

Home / New York City Juvenile Offender Homicide Lawyer

New York City Juvenile Offender Homicide Lawyer

When a young person is charged with homicide in New York City, the legal path forward is unlike any other criminal matter in the system. The charge itself carries maximum consequences, but the age of the accused fundamentally changes what is at stake, what courts have jurisdiction, what defenses apply, and what outcomes are actually achievable. A New York City juvenile offender homicide lawyer must understand both the adult criminal framework and the Family Court system simultaneously, because in New York, a homicide charge can move between those worlds depending on how prosecutors and courts choose to proceed.

New York’s Juvenile Offender statute makes certain homicide charges against individuals as young as thirteen prosecutable in adult criminal court from the outset. That means a thirteen-year-old charged with murder in the second degree can face adult prosecution, adult sentencing ranges, and the full weight of the criminal justice system without ever setting foot in Family Court initially. The statute was designed for the most serious offenses, and homicide sits at the top of that list. But being charged under the Juvenile Offender statute is not the end of the road. Removal proceedings, youthful offender treatment, and other mechanisms exist to change the trajectory of a case, and understanding how to use them requires counsel who has actually worked these cases at the highest level.

The families who face this situation are often blindsided. One moment their child is a minor with a future; the next, prosecutors are seeking to impose sentences measured in decades. Getting in front of this early, before arraignment strategy hardens and before the prosecution builds unchallenged momentum, can determine whether a young person’s life is salvageable. Representation must be immediate, strategic, and built around the specific facts of the charge, the accused’s background, and the realistic options for mitigation or removal.

What the Juvenile Offender Homicide System Actually Looks Like in New York

New York’s approach to juvenile homicide prosecutions is one of the more complex frameworks in the country. Under state law, children as young as thirteen can be charged as Juvenile Offenders when the allegation involves murder in the second degree. Those charged at fourteen or fifteen face adult prosecution for a broader range of serious felonies, including first-degree manslaughter. These cases begin in adult criminal court, not Family Court, which surprises most families. The Supreme Court in the relevant borough handles the matter, with prosecutors from the District Attorney’s office assigned to pursue conviction.

The Juvenile Offender designation does not mean the case stays in adult court permanently. Defense counsel can file a removal motion asking that the case be transferred to Family Court, where dispositions are generally more focused on rehabilitation than punishment. A judge evaluating a removal motion considers a range of factors: the seriousness of the alleged offense, the child’s prior record, the juvenile’s response to prior services, the nature and circumstances of the crime, and the interests of the community alongside the interests of the youth. Securing removal is not automatic. It requires a prepared, well-documented argument that the Family Court system can address the matter appropriately and that adult prosecution is not warranted given the totality of the circumstances.

Even when cases remain in adult court, Youthful Offender (YO) status is a critical tool. YO treatment, if granted, seals the adjudication and substitutes a YO finding for a criminal conviction. For a young person facing a homicide charge, YO treatment represents the difference between a sealed record that allows for a future and a felony conviction that follows them permanently. Courts retain discretion over YO treatment, and advocacy at the sentencing phase is essential to presenting the most compelling case for that relief.

Homicide Charges That Can Bring a Juvenile Into Adult Court

  • Murder in the Second Degree: Under New York Penal Law, this is the charge most likely to trigger adult court jurisdiction for a thirteen-year-old Juvenile Offender. Intentional killing and depraved indifference killings both fall under this statute, and prosecutors in the five boroughs pursue these cases with the same resources directed at adult defendants.
  • Murder in the First Degree: Reserved for aggravated circumstances such as killing a law enforcement officer, killing during certain predicate felonies, or killing in a particularly culpable manner. A fourteen or fifteen-year-old can be prosecuted for this charge as a Juvenile Offender in adult court.
  • Manslaughter in the First Degree: Involves intentional killing under circumstances such as extreme emotional disturbance, or a killing in the course of an altercation where intent is established but aggravating factors of murder are not. This charge frequently arises in street-level confrontations across Brooklyn, Queens, and the Bronx.
  • Manslaughter in the Second Degree: Reckless killing, where the accused is alleged to have consciously disregarded a substantial and unjustifiable risk that death would result. The recklessness element often becomes the center of the defense strategy in these cases.
  • Criminally Negligent Homicide: The least severe homicide charge, based on criminal negligence rather than intent or recklessness. While sometimes charged against juveniles in firearm-related deaths, it carries a lower sentencing exposure and represents a possible resolution in cases where the more serious charges cannot be sustained by the evidence.
  • Felony Murder: A killing that occurs during the commission of an enumerated serious felony, even if the juvenile did not personally deliver the fatal blow. Co-defendant situations involving young people are common in New York City, and the felony murder doctrine can sweep in participants who had no intent to kill anyone.
  • Attempted Murder: Not a homicide offense by its final result, but charged alongside or instead of completed homicide when the victim survives. Treated with equal severity in the Juvenile Offender context, and subject to the same adult court exposure.

What Families Should Do When a Juvenile Is Charged With Homicide

The first thing to understand is that anything a young person says to police, to other inmates if detained, to school officials, or even to family members can be used against them. The instinct after an arrest is to explain, to clarify, to tell the young person’s side of the story. Resist that instinct completely until counsel is in place. Statements made before an attorney is involved are among the most damaging pieces of evidence in any homicide prosecution.

If a juvenile has been arrested and charged in New York City, arraignment will occur at the relevant borough’s criminal courthouse. In Manhattan, that is 100 Centre Street. In Brooklyn, it is the Kings County Criminal Court at 120 Schermerhorn Street. In the Bronx, arraignments take place at 215 East 161st Street. In Queens, cases are processed through the Queens Criminal Court at 125-01 Queens Boulevard in Kew Gardens. Staten Island arraignments occur at the Richmond County Criminal Court on Targee Street. Knowing which courthouse is handling the matter and getting an attorney there for arraignment is essential, because arraignment is where bail arguments are made and where the initial framing of the case begins.

After arraignment, the focus shifts to discovery. Under New York’s current discovery framework, prosecutors must turn over substantial materials early in the process. Defense counsel should be reviewing everything from police reports to video surveillance footage to prior criminal history of witnesses and co-defendants. In juvenile homicide cases, the background of the accused matters enormously for both removal motions and eventual sentencing, so gathering school records, mental health records, family history, and any documentation of prior involvement with the Family Court or Administration for Children’s Services should begin immediately.

Do not wait for charges to materialize before engaging a lawyer. Investigations precede arrests, and in homicide cases, law enforcement is frequently building a case before anyone is formally charged. Pre-arrest intervention, the ability to monitor the investigation, limit damaging statements, and in some circumstances communicate strategically with investigators, is a legitimate defense function that can shape what charges are ultimately filed and against whom.

Why Jason Goldman Handles These Cases Differently

Jason Goldman began his career as a Brooklyn prosecutor, where he handled serious felony offenses at trial. That prosecutorial background means he has seen these cases from both sides of the courtroom. He knows how homicide cases are built, what evidence prosecutors prioritize, where their arguments tend to be weakest, and what juries actually respond to. He has tried more than twenty-five cases to verdict and built a practice that spans pre-arrest investigations, trials, and appellate work, which maps directly onto the phases of a juvenile homicide case.

The firm represents clients at every level of severity, from traditional homicide cases to complex multi-defendant situations where a young person’s actual role in a fatal event may be far more limited than the charges suggest. Goldman’s approach in cases that attract public attention includes strategic media engagement when it serves the client and deliberate silence when it does not. In juvenile cases, protecting the young person’s reputation and future is a parallel goal alongside the legal defense, and both require careful management from the first day of representation.

Recognized in the New York Post, on Fox 5, and by WABC, Goldman’s prominence in high-profile criminal defense in New York City reflects a practice built on results in the most serious cases. He is a member of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and the New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and he serves on the Criminal Courts Committee of the New York City Bar Association. For a family navigating a juvenile homicide charge, those credentials translate into a lawyer who is deeply embedded in the New York criminal defense community and who practices in these courts every day.

Questions Families Ask About Juvenile Homicide Cases in NYC

Can a thirteen-year-old really be prosecuted as an adult for murder in New York?

Yes. New York’s Juvenile Offender statute permits the prosecution of children as young as thirteen in adult criminal court when the charge involves murder in the second degree. This means the case is handled in Supreme Court, not Family Court, from the outset. The law was specifically written to address the most serious offenses, and homicide is the clearest example of when it applies.

What is the difference between Juvenile Offender and Youthful Offender status in New York?

A Juvenile Offender designation determines which court has initial jurisdiction over the case, an administrative classification based on age and charge. Youthful Offender status is a sentencing mechanism that, if granted by the court, replaces a criminal conviction with a sealed YO finding. These are distinct concepts. A juvenile charged as a JO can still receive YO treatment later in the case, which dramatically changes the long-term consequences.

What happens at a removal hearing, and how does defense counsel win one?

A removal hearing is the proceeding where a judge decides whether a Juvenile Offender case should be transferred from adult criminal court to Family Court. Defense counsel must demonstrate that the interests of the juvenile and the community are best served by Family Court jurisdiction. Strong advocacy at removal hearings includes presenting evidence about the youth’s background, mental health history, school performance, family support, and the availability of rehabilitative services. The argument must directly address the seriousness of the alleged offense and why Family Court can handle it appropriately.

If the juvenile did not actually kill anyone but was present during a crime that resulted in a death, can they still be charged with homicide?

Yes, and this situation is far more common than most families realize. Under the felony murder doctrine in New York, a person who participates in a serious felony can be charged with murder if someone dies during the commission of that felony, even if another person caused the death. In multi-defendant cases involving young people in New York City, prosecutors frequently charge everyone involved under this theory. Challenging felony murder allegations requires carefully analyzing what role, if any, the juvenile actually played and whether the legal requirements for the charge are actually met on those specific facts.

How does a prior Family Court record affect a juvenile homicide prosecution in adult court?

A prior Family Court record, including prior delinquency findings, can be considered by the adult court judge in several contexts, including bail arguments, removal hearing decisions, and sentencing. Prosecutors sometimes use prior involvement as evidence that the juvenile is not responsive to rehabilitative intervention, which is one of the factors courts weigh when deciding whether to remove a case to Family Court. Defense counsel must be prepared to address the prior record directly and contextualize it in a way that supports, rather than undermines, the defense narrative.

What sentencing ranges apply when a juvenile is convicted of homicide in adult court in New York?

Sentencing for Juvenile Offenders convicted of homicide in adult court is distinct from adult sentencing in one important respect: courts are required to consider the special mitigating factor of youth. However, the sentences can still be substantial. The specific ranges depend on the conviction charge and the sentencing judge’s exercise of discretion. Defense advocacy at sentencing must be comprehensive, presenting everything from the youth’s personal history and mental health evaluations to expert testimony about adolescent brain development and the circumstances surrounding the offense.

Can the family of the victim have any influence over how the case is prosecuted?

Victims and their families have a recognized role in the criminal process in New York, including the right to be heard at sentencing through victim impact statements. Prosecutors sometimes take victim family preferences into account when considering plea offers or charging decisions, though they are not bound by those preferences. In some cases, communication between defense counsel and victims’ representatives, handled carefully and appropriately, can be a factor in how a case resolves.

What role does a forensic mental health evaluation play in a juvenile homicide defense?

Mental health evaluations serve multiple purposes in these cases. They can establish competency to stand trial if that is at issue. They can support an affirmative defense if the facts warrant one. And in sentencing, a thorough forensic evaluation documenting trauma history, cognitive functioning, or mental illness can be among the most powerful tools for arguing against the maximum punishment. The evaluation must be conducted by a qualified forensic expert whose methodology will hold up under cross-examination, and defense counsel must be actively involved in shaping how the evaluation is framed and presented.

Is it possible to get a juvenile homicide charge dismissed before trial?

Yes, though it is not common in murder prosecutions. Dismissal before trial can result from successful challenges to the sufficiency of the grand jury evidence, constitutional violations in how evidence was obtained, or witness unavailability. Pre-trial motions challenging the admissibility of key evidence, including statements made by the juvenile during questioning, can sometimes so weaken the prosecution’s case that charges are reduced or dismissed. The strongest dismissal arguments almost always depend on facts that are specific to the investigation.

What if the homicide arose from a self-defense situation?

New York recognizes a justification defense that applies to the use of deadly physical force when a person reasonably believes they are about to be killed or suffer serious physical injury. This defense is available in juvenile homicide cases and, when the facts support it, can be one of the most powerful arguments at trial. The Law Offices of Jason Goldman recently secured dismissal of manslaughter and weapon charges in a self-defense stabbing case involving the subway, which reflects the kind of factual and legal analysis required to make justification defenses succeed.

Representing Families Across New York City’s Five Boroughs and Beyond

The Law Offices of Jason Goldman represents families facing juvenile homicide prosecutions throughout New York City and the surrounding region. In Manhattan, the firm handles cases from Harlem, Washington Heights, and Inwood through Midtown, the Lower East Side, and the Financial District. In Brooklyn, representation extends across Bedford-Stuyvesant, Crown Heights, Flatbush, Brownsville, East New York, Sunset Park, Bay Ridge, and every other community in Kings County. In the Bronx, the firm handles cases from the South Bronx, Fordham, Mott Haven, Tremont, and Morris Heights through the northern reaches of the borough. In Queens, clients come from Jamaica, Flushing, Astoria, Jackson Heights, Richmond Hill, Far Rockaway, and communities throughout the borough. On Staten Island, the firm represents families from St. George through Stapleton, New Brighton, and the South Shore communities. Beyond the five boroughs, the firm extends representation to clients in Nassau County, Suffolk County, Westchester County, and in federal matters throughout the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. Where warranted, Goldman also handles matters through pro hac vice admission in courts across the country.

New York City Juvenile Homicide Defense Attorney: Contact The Law Offices of Jason Goldman

A juvenile homicide charge in New York City compresses time and options in ways that most families are not prepared for. The decisions made in the first days after an arrest, about what to say, who to talk to, and how to respond to investigators and prosecutors, have consequences that extend for decades. A New York City juvenile homicide defense attorney who has tried these cases, who understands both the prosecutorial machinery and the defense tools available to disrupt it, and who operates at the level these cases demand is not a luxury. It is the only reasonable response to what is at stake.

Jason Goldman’s practice is selective by design. He takes on the cases where the stakes are highest, and he brings the full weight of his trial experience, investigative resources, and strategic judgment to bear from the first conversation. Contact the Law Offices of Jason Goldman directly by phone or email to discuss the situation confidentially and without obligation.

Your Defense
Begins Now.

Contact us today

Phone
212-466-6617
Address
275 Madison Avenue35th FloorNew York, NY 10016
* Required Field

By submitting this form I acknowledge that contacting Law Offices of Jason Goldman through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege.

protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms