Switch to ADA Accessible Theme
Close Menu

The Law Offices of Jason Goldman brings real courtroom experience to felony hearing cases in New York City and works toward the strongest outcome.

Home / New York City Felony Hearing Lawyer

New York City Felony Hearing Lawyer

Felony hearings are not formalities. Every proceeding between arraignment and trial carries real consequences, and what happens at each stage shapes the entire arc of a case. For defendants in New York, these hearings represent opportunities that many lawyers miss and pressure points that prosecutors actively exploit. Working with a New York City felony hearing lawyer who understands how to use each proceeding strategically, rather than simply getting through it, can determine whether a case collapses before trial or builds toward a result that protects your future.

New York’s felony process moves through a defined sequence: arraignment, grand jury proceedings, preliminary hearings, and a series of suppression and evidentiary motions that culminate in Huntley, Mapp, Dunaway, and Wade hearings, among others. Each of these is a distinct legal proceeding with its own standards, its own rules, and its own potential to alter the course of a prosecution. A defense that treats them as procedural checkboxes is not a defense at all. The right attorney uses every one of them as a tool.

In New York City, felony cases are processed through a court system that is simultaneously high-volume and high-stakes. The courtrooms of Manhattan Supreme Court, Brooklyn Supreme Court, the Bronx, Queens, and Staten Island each have their own culture, their own judges, and their own prosecutorial offices with distinct practices. Knowing how those offices operate, where they push hard and where they quietly fold, is local knowledge that only comes from actually working those courtrooms.

How Jason Goldman Approaches Felony Hearings in New York

Jason Goldman began his career as a Brooklyn prosecutor, which means he spent years on the other side of these hearings watching defense attorneys win and lose at the motion stage. That vantage point informs how he prepares today. He has tried more than 25 cases to verdict and has represented defendants at every stage of New York’s felony process, from pre-arrest investigation through sentencing and appeal. The New York Post has called him “High-Powered.” WABC’s Sid Rosenberg described him as “Brilliant.” The Chelsea News noted his “history of getting high-profile defendants off.” Those characterizations did not come from courtroom performance alone. They reflect what happens at the pretrial stage, where cases are won or lost before a single juror is seated.

Goldman’s practice spans both state and federal courts, covering the Southern District and Eastern District of New York as well as New York State Supreme Court and Criminal Court. For clients facing felony charges, that range matters. Federal and state prosecutions move differently, and the hearings each system offers look nothing alike. Goldman’s dual-track experience as both a NYC felony defense attorney and federal practitioner means he does not have to adjust his thinking mid-case when the procedural terrain shifts. He is a member of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and the New York City Bar Association, where he serves on the Criminal Courts Committee.

Felony Hearing Types and What Each One Actually Decides

  • Huntley Hearings: These hearings challenge the admissibility of statements made by a defendant to law enforcement. The central question is whether the statement was voluntary and whether Miranda rights were properly administered. If the statement is suppressed, prosecutors lose one of their most powerful tools at trial.
  • Mapp Hearings: Derived from the constitutional prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures, Mapp hearings contest whether physical evidence was lawfully obtained. In drug cases, weapon cases, and many financial crime prosecutions, the physical evidence is the case. Win a Mapp hearing and the prosecution may have nothing left to stand on.
  • Dunaway Hearings: These specifically examine whether law enforcement had probable cause to detain or arrest the defendant. If the arrest itself was unlawful, everything that followed may be tainted. This hearing can render an entire investigation worthless.
  • Wade Hearings: These address the reliability of eyewitness identifications and whether identification procedures, lineups, photo arrays, showups, were conducted fairly. New York has had extensive litigation over identification procedures, and a successful Wade hearing can eliminate an eyewitness whose testimony would otherwise be the emotional centerpiece of the prosecution.
  • Grand Jury Proceedings: In New York, felony charges require grand jury action. Defendants have a right to testify before the grand jury, a decision with enormous strategic consequences. Whether to exercise that right requires careful analysis of the evidence already assembled and the likely direction of the investigation.
  • Sandoval and Ventimiglia Hearings: These hearings, often overlooked in early case planning, determine what prior bad acts or convictions the prosecution may use to impeach a defendant who takes the stand. Getting ahead of Sandoval before trial gives the defense control over the narrative if the defendant testifies.
  • Bail and Detention Hearings: New York’s bail laws have undergone significant legislative change. For qualifying felonies, the court may consider various factors in making release determinations. A strong hearing argument at arraignment can mean the difference between a defendant who is free to assist in their own defense and one preparing for trial from a jail cell.

What to Do When Felony Charges Are on the Table

The period immediately following an arrest or the receipt of a grand jury subpoena is not a waiting period. It is the most consequential window in the entire case. The first thing to understand is that every statement made to law enforcement before an attorney is present can and will be used. This applies to informal conversations, to “clarifying” questions at the precinct, and to any communication with investigators who present themselves as helpful or sympathetic. Say nothing until counsel is present.

In New York City, felony cases originate in Criminal Court before being transferred to Supreme Court after a grand jury indictment or a felony complaint waiver. If your case is being prosecuted by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, you will eventually appear at 100 Centre Street. Brooklyn felonies run through the Brooklyn Supreme Court at 320 Jay Street. The Bronx has its courthouse at 265 East 161st Street. Queens felonies are handled at 125-01 Queens Boulevard in Kew Gardens, and Richmond County handles Staten Island matters at 18 Richmond Terrace. Knowing which office is prosecuting your case and which judges typically handle that courtroom’s calendar is information your attorney needs on day one.

Gather everything you can about the circumstances of the arrest or investigation as soon as possible: witness contact information, surveillance footage from nearby businesses, receipts or location data that establish where you were, and any prior communications with law enforcement. Physical evidence deteriorates and surveillance footage gets overwritten quickly. A defense attorney who also conducts independent investigation, as Goldman does through his use of private investigators and forensic experts, needs that material before it disappears.

One common mistake defendants make is assuming the case will “work itself out” before trial. In New York, the opposite is often true. The preliminary hearing stage is where prosecutors test their evidence, and a defendant without active representation during that period gives prosecutors a free look at their case without any adversarial pressure. Every week without an attorney reviewing discovery and preparing motions is a week the prosecution spends building its case unopposed.

What the Pretrial Record Actually Determines

There is a version of felony litigation where hearings are treated as obligatory steps on the way to a plea or a trial date. Then there is a version where those hearings are used as instruments. The difference between those two approaches often shows up in the result.

A successful suppression hearing does more than exclude one piece of evidence. It signals to prosecutors that the defense is prepared to fight on every front. It can reshape plea negotiations entirely. Prosecutors weigh their risk as carefully as defendants do, and a case with a suppressed confession or a contested identification becomes a harder case to take to trial. Goldman’s background as a former prosecutor gives him precise insight into how those risk calculations are made on the other side of the table.

For high-profile defendants or those whose cases have attracted media attention, pretrial proceedings also have a public dimension. Felony hearings are largely public record. How a hearing is handled, whether it goes quietly or becomes a platform, is itself a strategic choice. Goldman has represented corporate executives, doctors, politicians, athletes, and celebrities across this exact terrain, people for whom the courtroom is only one place where the story is told. Managing what happens in and around those proceedings requires both legal precision and the kind of strategic judgment that is difficult to separate from raw experience.

It is also worth noting that felony hearings create a record that travels. If the case proceeds to trial and eventually to appeal, the hearing transcripts become the foundation of any appellate argument. A well-made record at the suppression stage can be the basis for a successful appeal years later. A poorly conducted hearing can close off appellate arguments that might otherwise exist. Goldman’s practice covers sentencing and appellate work as well, which means he thinks about the long-term record while the proceedings are still underway.

Questions About Felony Hearings in New York

What is the difference between a felony hearing and a trial?

A felony hearing, such as a suppression or probable cause hearing, is a pretrial proceeding before a judge with no jury present. The purpose is to resolve a specific legal question, whether evidence should be excluded, whether the arrest was lawful, whether an identification procedure was reliable. A trial, by contrast, is the full adversarial proceeding where guilt or innocence is decided on all the evidence. Hearings shape what the trial looks like, or whether there is a trial at all.

Can a felony case be dismissed at the hearing stage?

Yes, and it happens more often than most people expect. If a Mapp hearing results in the suppression of the primary physical evidence, or a Dunaway hearing establishes that the arrest lacked probable cause, prosecutors may find they have no viable path to trial and move to dismiss. The hearing stage is genuinely a place where cases end, not just get modified.

Do I have to testify at a pretrial hearing?

In most suppression hearings, the defendant does not testify. The burden is typically on the prosecution to establish the lawfulness of their conduct. However, there are situations where a defendant’s testimony at a hearing becomes strategically useful or even necessary. That decision requires careful analysis because testimony at a hearing can carry consequences for later proceedings, including trial.

What happens if I testify before the grand jury?

Testifying before the grand jury in New York is a significant strategic decision. You give up your Fifth Amendment right for that proceeding, and anything you say can be used against you at trial. In some cases, grand jury testimony is valuable because it allows the defense to shape the narrative before an indictment issues. In others, it creates more risk than it avoids. This decision should never be made without experienced counsel who has reviewed the investigation file.

How long do felony hearings typically take in New York City courts?

It varies considerably by court, by the complexity of the hearing, and by judicial calendar. A single-issue Huntley hearing on a straightforward statement might be completed in one session. A multi-issue suppression hearing involving contested search warrants, identification procedures, and arrest circumstances could span several days of testimony across multiple appearances. New York City’s high-volume courts mean that scheduling itself can add weeks or months to the process. This is another reason early retention of counsel matters.

Can evidence suppressed at a hearing ever come back in at trial?

Suppressed evidence is generally excluded from the prosecution’s direct case. However, New York courts have recognized limited circumstances where suppressed statements, though not usable in the prosecution’s case-in-chief, may be used for impeachment if the defendant testifies inconsistently at trial. This is a nuanced area and one reason why hearing strategy cannot be planned in isolation from trial strategy.

What does a Sandoval ruling actually affect?

A Sandoval hearing determines what prior convictions or bad acts the prosecution can use to impeach a defendant who chooses to testify. The ruling directly shapes the decision about whether the defendant takes the stand. A defendant with a prior conviction who loses a Sandoval argument on a key offense may decide not to testify at all, which changes the entire structure of the defense. Getting favorable Sandoval rulings is often as tactically important as suppressing physical evidence.

If my case is in federal court, are the hearings different?

Significantly. Federal pretrial motions are governed by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and the Fourth Amendment suppression framework operates similarly in principle but differently in practice. Federal courts typically have faster-moving dockets and stricter filing deadlines for pretrial motions. The U.S. Attorney’s Office prosecutes federal felonies with substantial resources, and motion practice in federal court demands a high level of preparation and legal precision. Goldman practices in both the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York and is familiar with how those offices approach pretrial litigation.

Does the outcome of a hearing affect plea negotiations?

Consistently and directly. A strong defense showing at a suppression hearing changes the prosecutor’s risk calculation. If the primary evidence is suppressed or seriously weakened, the plea offer that was on the table before the hearing often improves substantially after it. Conversely, a defendant who enters plea discussions without having contested any evidence signals to the prosecution that they are not prepared to fight, which rarely produces the best outcome.

Can a felony hearing record help on appeal later?

Yes. The transcript of a pretrial hearing becomes part of the appellate record. Arguments that were preserved at the hearing stage can be raised on appeal if the trial court ruled incorrectly. Arguments that were never raised at the hearing are typically forfeited on appeal. This is why the quality of hearing representation has consequences that extend well beyond the hearing itself. An attorney who is already thinking about appeal while preparing for suppression motions builds a stronger long-term record.

Felony Hearing Representation Across New York City and Beyond

The Law Offices of Jason Goldman represents defendants facing felony charges throughout New York City, including clients in Manhattan, Brooklyn, the Bronx, Queens, and Staten Island. Within Manhattan, the firm’s clients come from neighborhoods across the borough, from Harlem and Washington Heights through the Upper West Side, Midtown, Chelsea, the West Village, SoHo, Tribeca, and the Lower East Side. In Brooklyn, the firm regularly handles matters originating in Crown Heights, Flatbush, Bed-Stuy, Sunset Park, Bay Ridge, Park Slope, and Williamsburg. Bronx cases come from Fordham, Mott Haven, Tremont, Pelham Parkway, and Co-op City, among others. Queens matters arise from Jamaica, Flushing, Astoria, Jackson Heights, Far Rockaway, and Forest Hills. Staten Island clients come from St. George, Tottenville, and the communities along the North Shore and South Shore.

Beyond the five boroughs, the firm extends representation to clients in Nassau County, Suffolk County, and Westchester County, as well as in federal courts throughout New York State. For select matters, Goldman has obtained pro hac vice admission to appear in courts outside New York entirely, making the firm’s representation available to clients whose cases cross state lines or involve federal charges in other jurisdictions.

Speak with a New York City Felony Defense Attorney About Your Hearing

The window between arrest and indictment, or between indictment and trial, is not a period to ride out. It is the period where a case is shaped or surrendered. If you are facing a felony in New York and have not yet addressed what happens at the pretrial hearing stage, that conversation needs to happen now. A New York City felony defense attorney who understands how to use suppression hearings, challenge identifications, and contest the foundation of a prosecution can change the direction of a case entirely before a single witness takes the stand at trial.

Contact the Law Offices of Jason Goldman to discuss your situation. Every detail of your case, including the circumstances of your arrest, any statements made to law enforcement, and the evidence the prosecution claims to have, is relevant to building a hearing strategy. Reach out by phone or email to schedule a consultation.

Your Defense
Begins Now.

Contact us today

Phone
212-466-6617
Address
275 Madison Avenue35th FloorNew York, NY 10016
* Required Field

By submitting this form I acknowledge that contacting Law Offices of Jason Goldman through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege.

protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms